October 20, 2026 — A homemade flying hoverboard crossed the Yangtze River earlier this month. The video went viral almost instantly, and the reaction was predictable: it looked like something out of a sci-fi movie. But the story behind it is more interesting than the spectacle. It is a story about what happens when a determined builder uses AI as a tool — not to fly the board, but to learn how to fly it.

The board's creator is a 26-year-old from Hubei named Song Xingyu, known online as "Shenqi Ayu." He built the device in two months, from scratch, after an earlier jet-powered version caught fire during testing.

Quick Answer: The hoverboard is a fully manual flight vehicle. It does not have an automatic balancing system. The pilot controls throttle with a finger ring and maintains stability using core body strength and reflexes. The AI component — two smartphones — functions as a real-time voice coach, monitoring the board's attitude and telling the pilot which way to lean. The 2.0 version uses 10 high-power brushless motors with over 30 kg of thrust each (enough to lift four adults) and draws up to 2,000 amps at peak. It successfully flew across a river for over 300 meters in early October.
10 Brushless Motors, 30kg+ Thrust Each 2,000 Amps Peak Current AI Used for Voice Coaching, Not Autopilot 300+ Meter River Crossing Manual Balance Required

How It Actually Works

The hoverboard's design is brutally simple: ten electric motors, a frame, a battery pack, and a finger-mounted throttle. There is no flight controller, no gyroscope array feeding a stability algorithm, and no automatic thrust vectoring.

Component Detail
Propulsion10 high-power brushless motor sets, each producing 30+ kg of thrust
Power drawUp to 2,000 amps at peak
ControlFinger-ring throttle — the pilot directly manages motor speed
BalanceFully manual — the pilot uses body weight and core strength to stay level
"AI" systemTwo smartphones: one on the board for attitude sensing, one on the wrist for AI voice feedback via Bluetooth

The first version used five micro turbojet engines. During testing, it caught fire — the exhaust gases from adjacent engines were being sucked back into the intakes. Song fed the data to an AI model, which analyzed the thermal imaging and recommended abandoning the jet design in favor of electric propulsion. That advice led to the 2.0 version.


The AI's Real Job: Voice Coach, Not Flight Control

This is the part most coverage gets wrong. The AI in this project is not flying the board. It cannot adjust motor speeds or vector thrust. It cannot correct the pilot's balance.

What it does is simpler, and in its own way more clever: it acts as a real-time coach.

One phone is mounted on the board, using its sensors to measure tilt and orientation. The other is worn by the pilot. The AI analyzes the board's attitude and sends voice prompts through a Bluetooth earpiece: "lean left," "bend your right knee," "center your weight." The pilot then makes the adjustment manually.

Why This Approach Makes Sense

Building a closed-loop flight controller for a 2,000-amp, 10-motor platform is an enormous engineering challenge. It requires precise sensor fusion, extremely low-latency motor control, and extensive tuning. Song had two months and a limited budget. Using AI as a coaching layer — rather than a control layer — was a pragmatic compromise. It allowed him to fly safely without building a full autopilot system from scratch.


A Reader's Perspective: The Next Step for Stabilization

One of our readers, Stephen Roach, looked at the engineering challenge from a constructive angle — not critiquing what it lacks, but pointing to where it could go next:

“ This is an incredibly bold and hardcore piece of engineering. Watching it fly, you can see the pilot is essentially acting as the flight controller, using core strength to fight the massive torque of the motors. It perfectly demonstrates raw power, but the lack of an automatic stabilization system means the human reaction time is the safety limit. If the creator wants to take this further, the next step could be introducing a physical flight controller (like drone IMUs and gyroscopes) to dynamically adjust thrust distribution. This would lower the barrier to entry and provide a crucial safety net. It's currently a brilliant extreme sports machine, but adding dynamic balance algorithms could turn it into a truly mature personal mobility device. — Stephen Roach Reader contribution, Gzmato Blog (Personal View)

His suggestion points directly at the gap between this project and a commercially viable product. The hardware is already there — the motors are powerful enough, the frame holds, the battery delivers. What is missing is the software layer that turns raw power into controlled flight.


Why a Drone Hovers Itself, But This Doesn't

It is worth explaining why a DJI drone can hover perfectly in place with zero pilot input, while a 100,000-watt hoverboard requires constant human adjustment.

The difference is control loop latency and redundancy. A drone's flight controller reads sensor data thousands of times per second and adjusts motor speeds in microseconds. It is designed from the ground up for stability. The hoverboard has no such system — it relies on the pilot's nervous system and muscles to close the loop. The human reaction time (around 200 milliseconds) is far too slow for the precision required at this power level, which is why the board is so difficult to ride.

The safety implication: Without an automatic balancing system, any lapse in concentration, gust of wind, or hardware glitch could result in a sudden loss of control. The board is not inherently unstable — but it has no safety net. The pilot is the safety net.

The Safety Reality

The board's creator has been transparent about the risks. The first version caught fire. The second version draws enough current to melt conventional wiring. The flight across the river was conducted after submitting a flight plan to local authorities.

Chinese state media coverage of the event included explicit warnings: this is a high-risk experimental project, and it should not be replicated. That is not a formality. The combination of 2,000 amps, 10 motors, and a human body standing on an unenclosed platform is inherently dangerous.


Key Takeaways

# What You Need to Know About the Flying Hoverboard
1It is fully manual — no automatic balancing, no flight controller, no thrust vectoring. The pilot balances with core strength.
2The AI is a voice coach, not an autopilot — two phones measure attitude and give verbal guidance, but the pilot makes every adjustment.
310 brushless motors, 30+ kg thrust each — total thrust sufficient to lift four adults, drawing up to 2,000 amps at peak.
4The first version was jet-powered — it caught fire during testing, and AI analysis recommended switching to electric propulsion.
5A drone hovers itself because of its flight controller — this board has no such system, which is why it is so difficult to ride.
6The 300-meter river crossing was a real, verified flight — conducted after submitting a flight plan to local authorities.
7This is not a consumer product — state media explicitly warned against replication. The risks are real and the safety net is the pilot's own reflexes.
The Bottom Line: The flying hoverboard is a remarkable piece of engineering, but it is not the autonomous vehicle people imagine when they hear "AI-assisted." It is a manual, high-power experimental device that happens to use AI as a coaching tool. That makes it harder to fly, not easier — and it makes the achievement of crossing a river on it more impressive, not less. The board is a testament to what a determined builder can do with limited resources and clever use of available tools. It is not a product, and it is not a safety-certified vehicle. It is a proof of concept — and a very good one.
Sources (as of October 20, 2026):
  • 长江云新闻 — Flight verification, river crossing details, safety warnings
  • 极目新闻 — Creator background, 2.0 version specifications, AI coaching system
  • 湖北日报 — Technical details, motor configuration, AI-assisted development process
  • IT之家 — AI crash analysis leading to electric redesign, smartphone-based attitude monitoring
  • 抖音 / 神奇阿宇 — Original video footage, flight demonstration, AI voice coaching implementation
  • Stephen Roach — Reader contribution on future stabilization engineering and safety
Published: October 20, 2026. Technical details and flight verification based on official media reports and the creator's own documentation. This device is a high-risk experimental project and should not be replicated.

Shop Tech & Hobbyist Gear at Gzmato

Drones | PC Components | RC Accessories | Electronic Parts

Special Offer: Use code TECH2026 for a discount on your first order!

Shop Tech at Gzmato
Curious about the technology behind DIY flight?

Our team can help you explore related electronics, sensors, and components. Chat with us or open a request.